The video was put together by a partisan Web site, www.biggovernment.com, which sent a man and a woman, dressed flagrantly as a pimp and a prostitute, to Acorn offices around the country to ask for assistance in setting up a prostitution business. In this video, the Acorn workers in Baltimore were eager to help, going so far as to suggest all sorts of tax dodges, lies and subterfuge to make the whorehouse a profitable enterprise and, at the same time, avoid law enforcement and federal taxes.
But as outrageous as that video is, the real outrage is this: Acorn, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is financed by taxpayer dollars! Despite the fact that it has been charged in several jurisdictions with voter fraud, Acorn has received $53 million in federal funds and stands to receive $8.5 Billion in Obama administration stimulus funds. Acorn receives money for federal housing assistance (hence, its employees could advise the pimp and prostitute on where to find housing for their underage workers), for voter registration and for other causes.
Acorn is unabashedly liberal, and the actors who exposed Acorn are unabashedly conservative, so some healthy skepticism is in order. An Acorn spokesman claimed the videos were false and threatened legal action, but Acorn fired the two employees in the video. Then Acorn claimed that BigGovernment.com had tried to trap Acorn employees in offices across the country but found fraud only in Baltimore. Then BigGovernment.com released additional videos from Acorn offices in San Bernardino, Calif., Washington, D.C., and others. Acorn employees at other offices were eager to help the budding entrepreneurs and ignore the illegality of prostitution, child sex slaves, tax fraud, etc.
Hidden-camera videos and reporters posing as someone else are always suspect, but you can't discount these videos merely because the organization that set up the sting was at political odds with Acorn. ABC News set up a sting of Food Lion several years ago, which was no less dubious than the BigGovernment.com expose of Acorn. A closer analogy was a sting set up by the Charlotte Observer a number of years ago attempting to prove that topless bars and massage parlors were fronts for prostitution. The Observer sent two "undercover" reporters, a male and a female, to these businesses and sought to catch the employees offering more than a show or a back rub. The Observer didn't have nearly as good a result as the Acorn sting. The actors who went to Acorn do not appear to be doing anything outside the parameters of investigative journalism.
Acorn has a lot of explaining to do, but so does Congress, which keeps shoveling taxpayer dollars to Acorn in the form of federal grants and pork-barrel appropriations. Want to eliminate waste and fraud in the federal budget? Start by cutting off taxpayer funding for all advocacy organizations. If Acorn, the American Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation or the Brookings Institute wants a grant, let it come from private funding, not from the federal budget.
"If Acorn, the American Enterprise Institute, the Heritage Foundation or the Brookings Institute wants a grant, let it come from private funding, not from the federal budget."
ReplyDeleteI can think of a few pork barrel organizations over in Wilson that should be getting their cash from private funding NOT the City budget.
Getting back to this over-killed story everyone has already seen.
It's a shame people are being asked to take this out of context by otherwise assumably intelligent people.
The reason it's a shame is because unlike those other organizations, ACORN does a lot of charitable work for people, unlike the American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation which does basically nothing for anyone. It would make much more sense and be more productive to advocate they clean their mess up and continue doing what they set out to do. Help people.
But of course, hook, line and sinker we instead get more pablum for the minority; aka right-wing lunatics.
What a disturbing story! I love your final suggestion. When are you going to run for congress? You've got my vote.
ReplyDelete...everyone has seen it except nancy pelosi and charlie gibson, and the rest of the main media news outlets. Typical selective reporting by these liberal polywags.
ReplyDeletethis makes me think of the problems in south africa. Give these people some power/money and they run a good thing into the ground. If one does a little research about south africa the past 5 years you will realize apartheid has been the worst possible thing for those it was to benefit. Very sad.
ReplyDeleteI think Anonymous # 3 means THE END OF apartheid, which was the system of enforced legal separation of the races under the former white-ruled regime.
ReplyDeleteWhat is sad is someone (Anon#3) saying (or attempting to say) the end of Apartheid was a bad thing.
ReplyDeleteHow blatantly racist can you get.
And it doesn't surprise me that you allow it.
Move to south africa and see for yourself who is better off. No one. The mentality of running the farms and business's cannot be replaced and all the going concerns were pilfered and run into the ground. Evidently you hide behind the truth with racism terminology. Sad.
ReplyDeleteI'm cutting off this tit-for-tat between Anonymous and Newsy now. But I'm wondering whether Anonymous is thinking of Zimbabwe, not South Africa, as an example of a spiral downward after colonial rule. I haven't followed South Africa closely, but I do know that Robert Mugabe's rule in Zimbabwe has been disastrous for everyone -- except Mugabe.
ReplyDeleteThis thread degraded at #3
ReplyDeletethis thread degraded at #1
ReplyDelete