This column was published in the Wilson Times July
13, 2019.
My wife and I watched the
first two Democratic Party debates June 26-27 because we didn’t know much about
most of the Democratic candidates for president and wanted to see what kind of
choices we’d have on primary day (nearly a year away). Although we had trouble
keeping up with the names and faces of 20 candidates, we did come away with
some impressions, some of which were favorable to the candidates.
Watching what most analysts
proclaimed the most impressive discussion of the entire debate and the turning
point of the evening, I told my wife, “The Republicans have to be loving this.”
The incident was Sen. Kamala
Harris’ angry takedown of Joe Biden, until that moment the leading Democratic
candidate, according to polls. Until she tore into Biden, I had been dreaming
of what a Harris-Trump presidential debate might look like in the general
election campaign. Harris had displayed, in both the debate and in the Senate
hearings on Supreme Court nominee Bret Kavenaugh, her persuasive, effective
debating skills that she had developed and practiced as a prosecuting attorney
and California attorney general.
But I never expected her to
aim her attack on Biden, the former vice president who served 26 years in the
U.S. Senate. Harris’ attack was obviously planned and practiced. She came to
the edge of calling Biden a closet racist without actually saying that. She
attacked Biden for having said he worked with Democratic segregationists to get
good things done in the Senate. As a senator, Harris knows you don’t get things
done in the upper chamber unless you have a three-fifths majority, and that
often means corralling a few senators with contrary views but decades of
longevity and considerable legislative power. In a recent speech, Biden had
acknowledged that and bragged of his effectiveness, because of his abilities, in
getting important civil rights legislation passed.
Harris added to that attack with
another angle, a sort of flanking movement against Biden, saying he failed to
support busing as a means of forcing racial integration in schools. Biden said
he only opposed the U.S. Department of Justice’s demand, contrary to local
feelings, that children should be bused away from their neighborhood schools to
achieve an arbitrary racial balance.
Proving her attack on Biden
was planned and practiced, Harris said she was one of those children who were
bused — two decades after Brown v. Board of Education — and her campaign
conveniently posted a photo of cute little Kamala on her way to first grade.
The Harris campaign failed
to acknowledge at the time that Harris had supported just the sort of busing
that Biden defended — busing that had the support of local elected officials
and families — but not Washington-ordered, disruptive busing. Perhaps Harris is
too young to remember how traumatic “forced busing” solutions were. In South
Boston, a thousand miles from the segregationist states of the Old South,
violent riots broke out as opponents opposed busing children to distant schools
in other neighborhoods. The federal government, frustrated by local opposition,
ordered more and more desegregation solutions built on putting small children
on school buses for hours each day. The city of Richmond, VA, was told it would
have to bus children to and from neighboring suburban municipalities,
obliterating boundaries established by the state constitution.
After recognizing the
futility of ordering private citizens to send children to a school designated
by bureaucrats in distant Washington, D.C., federal officials backed off the oppressive
“fall in line or else” approach, and the busing controversy faded away. Some
cities, such as Charlotte, embraced a form of busing (with various options for
families).
In the 1990s, after several
efforts to create a mandated racial balance in schools, the Wilson County Board
of Education abandoned its paired-school (court mandated) desegregation plan in
favor of a neighborhood school plan. African-American members of the Board of
Education voted with the majority for neighborhood schools, ending cross-town
busing.
The worst thing loyal
Democrats can do in the 2020 presidential election is sabotage their leading
candidates with misleading criticism of what they did or didn’t do a generation
or more ago. Don’t create a “circular firing squad” to choose the party’s
nominee.
No comments:
Post a Comment